Custom Web Application Development with Angular, React, Next.js and PHP
We offer custom web application and website development – we choose the right technical stack according to your goals. We compare Angular, React, Next.js and PHP to help you make an informed decision.
Advantages of Angular, React, Next.js and PHP
Business Results
Focus on KPI: conversions, leads, SEO visibility and time to market.
Architecture by Measure
SPA/SSR/SSG/ISR, monolithic or microservices – we choose, prove and deliver.
Quality & Security
TypeScript, tests, CI/CD, OWASP practices and monitoring.
Long-Term Support
SLA, roadmap, optimizations and preventive updates.
Four Proven Technical Approaches
Angular (SPA/SSR)
Full-stack framework with strict structure, DI, RxJS and official solutions for routing, forms and state. Suitable for large teams and complex corporate applications.
- Consistency and standardization
- Strong typing and tooling
- Good choice for long-term projects
React (SPA)
Flexible UI library with huge ecosystem. Excellent for interactive applications, dashboards and frontends, when SEO is not a leading factor or solved through other channels.
- Lightweight and modular
- Rich package ecosystem
- Quick start for MVP
Next.js (SSR/SSG/ISR)
Framework over React, adding server-side rendering, static generation and performance optimizations – ideal for SEO-critical websites and content.
- Better indexing and CWV
- Ready routing and App Router
- Excellent integration with headless CMS
PHP (Laravel/WordPress)
Classical server-side rendered stack with wide hosting, low infrastructure cost and excellent content management. Suitable for corporate websites, blogs and catalog solutions.
- SEO by default (SSR)
- Rich CMS ecosystem
- Affordable maintenance costs
Comparison: Angular vs React vs Next.js vs PHP
| Criterion | Angular | React | Next.js | PHP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rendering | CSR by default, possible SSR | CSR (SPA) | SSR/SSG/ISR (by sections) | SSR by default |
| SEO | Good at SSR; otherwise limited | Limited at pure SPA, requires additional solutions | Excellent (indexing from first render) | Very good (server-side templates) |
| Core Web Vitals | Depends on implementation | Depends on bundle and optimizations | Built-in optimizations (Image/Font, code-splitting) | Good at caching/optimization |
| Time to market | Longer, but stable for large teams | Fast for MVP and dashboards | Fast for websites/content | Fast at ready CMS |
| Applicable cases | Corporate SPA, complex UI | Interactive applications, dashboards | SEO websites, blogs, headless eCom | Corporate websites, blogs, catalogs |
| Team scalability | From medium to large | From small to large | From small to medium/large | From small to medium |
| Infrastructure | Node SSR/static hosting | Static/SPA hosting | Vercel/Edge/CDN, Node | Wide access, cheap hosting |
| Maintenance costs | Higher at complexity | Medium | Medium (depends on traffic) | Low to medium |
*Note: The specific results depend on the architecture, content and optimizations. We will recommend the most suitable stack according to your goals.
Recommended scenarios
- SEO-oriented websites and blogs → Next.js or PHP (WP)
- Interactive applications/dashboards → React or Angular
- Headless eCommerce → Next.js frontend + headless CMS
- Complex corporate UI → Angular